soph (
sophia_sol) wrote2011-05-10 10:19 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Taiwan and The Odyssey
I have RETURNED FROM TAIWAN. Er. I forgot to mention that's where I was going, didn't I. So. I was in Taiwan! And now I've returned! It was fun!
And that means now I get to go look at how long my f/rlist's gotten and weep. And also attack all the comments I've been meaning to respond to....
In other news, I just read The Odyssey for the first time ever. And it's, like, good or something. Shocker! I enjoyed the heck out of most of it, and spent a bunch of the first part happily shipping Telemachus/Athena-in-Mentor's-body (what, they totally have a mutual appreciation society going on), until in the second half it becomes more clear that really Athena just thinks Odysseus is totally awesome and forgets all about Telemachus to lavish her attention on Odysseus.
(I also shipped Odysseus/what's-his-face-the-swineherd a little bit. Another mutual appreciation society!)
Reading it, I ended up being rather surprised by some things about it, in which I had false expectations from my impressions from popular culture. The story was presented all inside out and backwards from how I was expecting. Silly me, I thought it was going to be ALL focusing on Odysseus, and that it was going to be relatively chronological. Nope! But I am OKAY WITH THAT. I kind of think Telemachus is awesome. Also I was fascinated that Odysseus gets home like halfway through the book. And the entire second half is him dealing with the issues of the unwanted suitors! The way that popular culture carries on about the Awesome Adventures Of Odysseus' Travels, you'd never guess. Years and years of travels take up one half the book, and a few days of doing stuff the entire second half. I THINK I CAN GUESS WHAT THE AUTHOR THOUGHT WAS MORE IMPORTANT. Hint: it's not the same thing we do.
Also the ending is really kind of weird. Oh look, there's going to be a battle between Odysseus' folks and the families of the dead suitors! Things are all gearing up! Things are tense and dramatic! Athena steps out and is like, "um, no" and then it all just ends? NOT VERY CONCLUSATORY. Or at least, the pacing feels all messed up to me.
In other news, I really like the rhythm of the language in the Odyssey. I got really caught up in it, and really loved it. Even though it does lots of things that are frowned on in modern composition, it works.
Also I love the sensation of being immersed in another cultures mores and values like that. The absolute importance placed on the proper treatment of guests, for example. Fascinating!
And now I think I have to read the Iliad, because -- actual slashtasticness that I hardly need to read into at all! Unlike the Odyssey where I kept on finding places TO read slash into it, but it would require actual effort to make arguments for the slash. Unlike Achilles/Patrocles.
Except that I'm kind of bored, mostly, by books that go on and on about war. I was bored in the warmongering bits of the Odyssey already, and there are a LOT fewer than there are in a book that's, well, all ABOUT war. So.
(actually what I am reading now is Wuthering Heights. It was kind of an abrupt brainshift to go straight from Odyssey to Wuthering Heights. They are very different from each other!)
sentientcitizen can attest that it is pretty hilarious the way, if you get me started about The Odyssey, I will swing wildly back and forth between earnest-academic and squeeful-fan in my expressions of enjoyment. I GO BOTH WAYS, OKAY. Except that I think this post ended up being more of the latter than the former? It wouldn't take much to get me nattering academically though, I think!
And that means now I get to go look at how long my f/rlist's gotten and weep. And also attack all the comments I've been meaning to respond to....
In other news, I just read The Odyssey for the first time ever. And it's, like, good or something. Shocker! I enjoyed the heck out of most of it, and spent a bunch of the first part happily shipping Telemachus/Athena-in-Mentor's-body (what, they totally have a mutual appreciation society going on), until in the second half it becomes more clear that really Athena just thinks Odysseus is totally awesome and forgets all about Telemachus to lavish her attention on Odysseus.
(I also shipped Odysseus/what's-his-face-the-swineherd a little bit. Another mutual appreciation society!)
Reading it, I ended up being rather surprised by some things about it, in which I had false expectations from my impressions from popular culture. The story was presented all inside out and backwards from how I was expecting. Silly me, I thought it was going to be ALL focusing on Odysseus, and that it was going to be relatively chronological. Nope! But I am OKAY WITH THAT. I kind of think Telemachus is awesome. Also I was fascinated that Odysseus gets home like halfway through the book. And the entire second half is him dealing with the issues of the unwanted suitors! The way that popular culture carries on about the Awesome Adventures Of Odysseus' Travels, you'd never guess. Years and years of travels take up one half the book, and a few days of doing stuff the entire second half. I THINK I CAN GUESS WHAT THE AUTHOR THOUGHT WAS MORE IMPORTANT. Hint: it's not the same thing we do.
Also the ending is really kind of weird. Oh look, there's going to be a battle between Odysseus' folks and the families of the dead suitors! Things are all gearing up! Things are tense and dramatic! Athena steps out and is like, "um, no" and then it all just ends? NOT VERY CONCLUSATORY. Or at least, the pacing feels all messed up to me.
In other news, I really like the rhythm of the language in the Odyssey. I got really caught up in it, and really loved it. Even though it does lots of things that are frowned on in modern composition, it works.
Also I love the sensation of being immersed in another cultures mores and values like that. The absolute importance placed on the proper treatment of guests, for example. Fascinating!
And now I think I have to read the Iliad, because -- actual slashtasticness that I hardly need to read into at all! Unlike the Odyssey where I kept on finding places TO read slash into it, but it would require actual effort to make arguments for the slash. Unlike Achilles/Patrocles.
Except that I'm kind of bored, mostly, by books that go on and on about war. I was bored in the warmongering bits of the Odyssey already, and there are a LOT fewer than there are in a book that's, well, all ABOUT war. So.
(actually what I am reading now is Wuthering Heights. It was kind of an abrupt brainshift to go straight from Odyssey to Wuthering Heights. They are very different from each other!)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
no subject
Telemachus/Athena-in-Mentor's-body is a great ship! I support that.
On the plus side, you are now poised in the perfect moment to read Joyce's Ulysses. Seriously, the best time to read Ulysses is right after reading The Odyssey. Every time I reread Ulysses I go back and reread The Odyssey first. So, I say, seize the opportunity! Trust me, it's plenty slashtastic, too.
no subject
And...Ulysses was on my to-read list, but one of the footnotes of my copy of the Odyssey included a quote from Ulysses and I kind of blanched and went MAYBE NEVER MIND because it looks like the kind of book that would be a lot of work to read, even if it is good. Which is not so much my thing!
no subject
It also... can be a good deal of work. It doesn't have to be, but much of the enjoyment comes from being invested in the work. Yes, I won't deny that. It's work I enjoy, work I enjoy so much that whenever I encourage a friend to read Ulysses it comes with a blanket offer: Call me whenever you want, IM me whenever you want, and I will talk you through anything you need help with.
Also, it starts out easy and fun and gets more complicated as it goes along. There is actually a reading curve to get you acclimated, so even though it's complicated it's not really scary. My professor told us "Joyce teaches you how to read Ulysses in Ulysses".
Also, ahha "his constant need to be overly wily about EVERYTHING" is a great way to describe him. I love it.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I am a classics person and *I* have not yet read either of the homeric epics from start to finish. I keep meaning to do something about that... So I am really impressed!
Out of curiosity, what translation did you use?
Athena steps out and is like
Ahaha, deus ex machina!!! For some reason I find this really funny, probably how you phrased it. The ending is frequently used in tragedies too, where the god steps in at the last second and prevents (further) bloodshed. It is sort of very abrupt and very different from modern storytelling expectations.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(of course, it doesn't matter hugely to me, spoilerphile that I am, but I am deeply immersed in fandom's culture of how to approach spoilers, and breaking it feels ANATHEMA.)
no subject
You totally should read the homeric epics in their entirety! Thus far I can tell you it's very much worth it!
My translation was...Robert Fagles, I think. Yes.
See, the thing about the Athena thing is that she'd been so intimately involved in the proceedings all through the book, nudging people into doing the right thing, and this felt like it was going to be another thing like that, but then it was just OKAY THAT'S ALL FOLKS THE END. But yeah, probs I'd be less thrown by the ending if that was the storytelling style I'd grown up with!
no subject
Homer is on my list! I think there might be a bigger chance I'll feel motivated once I've finished Latin, though.
Hee, well, they Doylist view would definitely be to say that the narrator ran out of time/ink. Probably it also it didn't feel so bad back then, because everyone was so familiar with all the myths, that people would think, "Oh, right, and then after that these things happened." Hmm... I don't know if there's anything specific about Odysseus later... I *think* there's a specific myth about his death, though?
no subject
Silly medieval people, not putting in subway systems. *grin*
You should totally read Homer! But Latin is an excellent priority too.
I do like the Doylist view!
Yeah, there's a myth about his death. And it's mentioned in the Odyssey, actually. There's a prophecy, doncha know.
no subject
Hee, what a coincidence that there should be a prophecy! Astounding stuff :oP
no subject
no subject
Hee, I've been to Paris once, and I found it to be quite full of North Americans ;o)
no subject
no subject
1. The ending! My theory about the ending is basically exactly the opposite of calvinahobbes' above-- I don't think it was that he ran out of time, I think it was that he needed to tack something on the end: someone yelled "encore!" or something after the real story was finished towars the end of the 23rd section, so he started this whole new plot that would have taken too long to vring to an actual concluion, so he just chopped it off with Athena.
There are a whole bunch of fragments of other epics, one of which picks up where the Odyssey left off-- if I remember correctly, a son he had with... uh brain not working I don't remember who but one of the women on his way home had a child by him, who went looking for him and ended up killing him. I think. It's hard to date all these things, though, so I have no idea if Homer's listeners would have known of that.
You should 100% read the Iliad! In theory, I like the Odyssey better because the story is cooler, but for some reason I always end up going to the Iliad when I am in a Homeric mood. A cool thing about the Iliad which also applies, although not as well, the the Odyssey is that it's... symmetrical. i had a handy diagram, but it"s in Montreal.. basically, if you lay out the events in each book, there are parallels between the events in equivalent books, pivoting around the exact middle of the composition. er... i thought that was cool ? In terms of the Iliad being less interessting because it's just war, well, yeah... um, there is a whole book, I forget which one, that's just a list of all the ships and people who are participating in the war. So that bit is boring and useless and should be skipped over. But there are also really excellent non-war moments, like Hactor's wish for his son which made me LEGIT CRY the first time i read it.
no subject
I like your ending theory too! Now I want to go back and reread the ending again with both yours and Calvina's theories in mind and see what I think is up.
OKAY if you think the Iliad is that awesome then I am totally reading it! Except I don't have a copy sitting readily to hand like I did the Odyssey, so I'll have to go find myself a copy. Do you know what the good translations are? I liked Fagles' Odyssey, but it would be good to have multiple options when I go searching used bookstores!
Also, yes, you are NOT THE ONLY ONE that thinks that the symmetry of composition is cool. THAT IS SO COOL.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
My copy is the W.H.D. Rouse translation; I got it at one of those get-kids-to-read "read x number of books and you win... a book!" things (I am a compulsive and voracious reader, so until I got WAY TOO OLD for them to let me do those anymore, my only problem was finding books I hadn't read yet to qualify! *g*) and it is AWESOME. Although it is in prose.
(Which was probably just as well, as I have trouble with poetry unless I can read it out loud. In the original. CANTERBURY TALES. ...yeah. I can't read Greek because some of the letters are also in Elvish only with different sounds, which confuses me.)
Anyway. Point. ODYSSEY. :D I was a fan even from the kiddie retellings I used to read - I was always Odysseus when we played Trojan War (we were strange kids, yeah) - but the real thing is Quite A Lot Awesomer. So I am basically agreeing with you on that, and now I will stop babbling. Maybe. ;-)
no subject
(CANTERBURY TALES. So awesome! I totally need to read the whole thing, at some point. But speaking of reading it out loud in the original, there was a dude in a West Civ class of mine once who knew all the rules of proper pronunciation of Middle English, and had the opening of the Canterbury Tales memorized, and it was so fascinating to listen to him recite it. It sounded like a totally foreign language, even though on the page it's half-comprehensible!)
(Also, you can read ELVISH? Awesome!)
Oh, hey, that is AWESOME that you used to play Trojan War as a kid! I was certainly a huge fan of greek myths as a kid, and read up a lot about them in bowdlerized versions, so I was pretty familiar already with a lot of the bits of the story from The Odyssey, but yeah, the real thing is DEFINITELY awesomer.
no subject
'Also, you can read ELVISH? Awesome!'
The alphabet only, and a few dozen of the words (transliterated). I can read the LOTR and Silm maps for name-meaning pretty accurately, and translate the "A Elbereth Gilthoniel" and "Namariƫ" from memory - and I made up my username from cobbled-together bits - but I can't really do conjugations and such.
no subject
That's still very cool, that you know as much Elvish as that.