sophia_sol: photo of a 19th century ivory carving of a fat bird (Default)
Whew, coming in just under the wire, here's my voting plans for the Hugo best novel! Obviously She Who Became The Sun is required to win, but in any other year both my #2 and #3 choices would be strong contenders for first place in my mind, and it's just too bad they can't all three get awards! Links to my full reviews in the titles of the books.

1. She Who Became the Sun, by Shelley Parker-Chan

I cannot vote anything but this for first place because it's perfect in every way.

2. A Desolation Called Peace, by Arkady Martine

It may not reach the same degree of delighting-me-on-every-level that A Memory Called Empire did, but it's still a fascinating and compelling book and very well done.

3. Light From Uncommon Stars, by Ryka Aoki

A book that's doing its own thing, haven't really seen anything else like it, and I am HERE for it.

4. A Master of Djinn, by P Djélí Clark

Not as strong as his novella in the same world (The Haunting of Tram Car 015), especially in terms of development of character for the protagonist, so I was disappointed -- but it was still good, and I do love the worldbuilding.

5. The Galaxy and the Ground Within, by Becky Chambers

Usually I love Chambers' approach of writing plotless novels about disparate characters interacting and being generally hopeful, but this one focuses on themes of children and parenthood and reproductive choices, and those are just not themes that inherently speak to me, so instead of finding it cozily enjoyable I was just bored.

6. Project Hail Mary, by Andy Weir

Andy Weir doesn't understand how humans work, doesn't understand how the soft sciences work, doesn't understand how communication works, is a little too into leaders being autocratic, and mostly just cares about expositing at length about science things he thinks are cool. I'm glad he has found his niche, and I am charmed by how much he loves science, but I did not like this book.
sophia_sol: photo of a 19th century ivory carving of a fat bird (Default)
Well this is perhaps the most Andy Weir book it is possible for a book to be. I've only read Weir's debut, The Martian, and this is basically exactly that again but different, tbh. Lone scientist stranded in space who must science the shit out of things to save the day, shallow one-note characterization, and a narrative that is clearly enormously excited by the minute details of how the science things work.

And like, I love that for Weir, that he's found and succeeded in his niche so well, and I'm charmed by how much he loves science, but.....I do really wish he were at all better at writing people. I enjoyed The Martian a great deal, but the kind of book Weir writes feels to me like the kind of book I only have interest in reading one of. I wouldn't have even bothered to pick this up if it weren't for the Hugos.

But also, even though this book is the same kind of thing again, I think it's not as much to his strengths as The Martian!

Half the book takes place in flashbacks to the time when the main character is on earth and preparing for the crisis along with a bunch of other people, and I was just SO impatient in those sections tbh, because we already know where it leads (him going to space), and all it does is allow for more talking about science but without the same level of like, urgency and interest? Plus extra focus on interpersonal dynamics, between his various one-note characters, which I found boring and occasionally all the way to uncomfortable. And I really dislike the general narrative vibe of "oh well when it's an emergency it's helpful for someone to act like a dictator about it so this is good actually" with respect to the leader of the project, Stratt, so I kind of hated every scene she showed up in, which was most of them in the flashbacks.

And the sections of the book that take place in the "present" of the main character involve alien first contact and let me just say that Weir is not a man who understands the difficulties with cross-cultural (cross-SPECIES!) communication, and how very complicated language and translation can be! He and the alien just quickly and easily knock up a computer-translation software between them after figuring out what words in english translate to what words in the eridian language and then communicate with remarkable ease after only a few days of this effort, including very high-level abstract concepts. They even seem to have compatible senses of humour, to a degree. That is a whole bunch of wishful thinking, my guy!!! (And it also makes me wonder what else he's drastically oversimplifying to the point of hilarity in the various other science things he talks about, tbh. Or is it just that he thinks soft sciences aren't real sciences and he doesn't need to do the same degree of research into them?? Sigh.)

Also this is just an extremely petty personal thing but I don't like that Weir chose to use "astrophage" as both the plural and the singular. You have one astrophage or two astrophage or a lot of astrophage. And yes, english has some words that do that with pluralization, but they're irregular nouns, and it's weird to do that with a brand new invented noun, and it threw me off every time he referred to a whole lot of astrophage as such. (Also he capitalized astrophage on every usage which I feel even pettier about. Disagree with that choice!!)

And look. Look. I recognize that the science is what Weir is ultimately here for, so that's where he focuses most of his energy -- but I don't actually read novels to be given science lessons, and most of the time when his characters expounded on some scientific concept for paragraphs or pages, I just skipped over the lessons to get to why the thing they were talking about mattered. Because the specific detailed explanations DON'T matter to the story being told!

So all in all, this is a book that is aimed at an audience who has VERY different priorities in their fiction reading than I do, and I mostly alternated between being bored and annoyed. Weir does have a rather moreish narrative voice though, and made me want to find out how the book would end, so I was carried along through my boredom and annoyance with more ease than one might expect. And in the end the book did get me in my feels a bit. The power of friendship means a lot to me, what can I say!

So. Not the worst book, but I really didn't enjoy it overall.
sophia_sol: photo of a 19th century ivory carving of a fat bird (Default)
A reread! Because I couldn't not after watching the movie. (Can you tell how far behind I am in posting my book thoughts?) I still love the unrepentant nerdiness at the level of science detail going on in this book. And the amount of things that can/do go wrong! It made me realize JUST HOW MUCH the movie had abbreviated Watney's problems.

But I was also reminded of just how little depth there really is to any of the characterization. And the writing quality stood out to me more this time as being... mm, not exactly the work of an experienced writer. It gets away with this in Watney's logs, but the narrative parts back on Earth (and the Hermes and so forth) are a bit more unfelicitous.

But oh well I LOVE IT ANYWAY it's charming and suuuuuper nerdy and that's enough to make me happy apparently.

Most Popular Tags

Page generated Jun. 10th, 2025 06:42 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios