sophia_sol: photo of a 19th century ivory carving of a fat bird (Default)
An odd sort of fantasy novel where it's like....mostly about the experience of community theatre, and interpersonal relationships, and learning to understand yourself better, but the theatre's director happens to be a faery. I like this approach! But the book as a whole was, idk, I more or less enjoyed the reading of it but I also found it fairly frustrating.

First of all, a large cast of eccentric characters isn't really my thing; I had trouble keeping track of them all and who they were and what their relationships were with each other, and most of them were fairly one-note characters. (some of those one notes were fun! but put together it was a lot.)

Second....the romance. cut for spoilers )

Sigh.

The book was promising! I really wanted to like it! But the more it became about the romance and about how tragic and wonderful Rowan was, the more I squirmed and skimmed ahead. In the end I would have preferred this book to not be fantasy at all, I think. Cut Rowan and faeries entirely, narratively reprioritise how important it is that Maggie is finally able to develop close supportive friendships instead, and I'd be here for this! But that would be an different book.
sophia_sol: photo of a 19th century ivory carving of a fat bird (Default)
I've been having a grand time reading this book a few pages a day for months, and I finally reached the end! It calls itself an "advanced" birding book, which at first intimidated me because I thought it meant I had to be advanced to understand what it was saying, but no, it's a book that is designed to take any birder and teach them the skills needed to become more advanced.

I loved the underlying mindset of the book, that the best way to be a birder is to bird in the way that makes you happy, and a good birder is a birder who finds joy in the experience, however they approach it. And this book is merely meant to be a resource for the kind of birder who's into getting really careful and detailed about bird ID, but that doesn't mean it's the only way to bird, and this approach isn't for everyone.

But this approach IS for MEEEEE.

The book starts with an extensive section teaching you things that are relevant to ID for any type of bird: about the structure of feathers in wing, tail, and body; about molting and other changes to feather appearance over time; about behaviour; about songs and calls; and so forth. Then it goes on to illustrate its principles by discussing specific groups of birds for whom ID can be challenging, and what you can do to help you better understand what you're seeing in these contexts.

The example birds are all North American, so it's a book that may be best for a North American birder, but the first section is relevant for birders no matter where they live and what birds they're looking at.

I found it very engagingly written, not dry at all, and I have learned SO much from it. I have started looking at birds in a whole new way since getting into this book, and it's added so much to my birding experience!

I also appreciate that it's very practical, discussing what you're likely to experience in real world contexts, and what to do about it. So for example in the chapter on seabirds, it's like, you're almost certainly going to only ever see these birds in the context of a chartered birding experience on a boat, with an expert on board to point things out, so here's some good ways to help you to make the most of that context.

I will admit I did a bit of skimming in the chapter on Empidonax flycatchers. The author makes it clear in a number of places throughout the book that sometimes the correct ID answer to a bird you see is "there isn't enough information available to me to make a certain ID" and that is particularly emphasised in the Empids. For a number of Empids you can only really be certain about your ID if you hear the voice, because they look so similar and the amount of visible variation within a species can overlap so much with the variation between species. So reading through careful descriptions of what kinds of barely noticeable field marks MIGHT be a mildly useful sign in pointing towards one Empid over another just....didn't feel worthwhile to me personally to spend that many pages on, at least at this stage of my birding skills. It's possible I'll feel differently once I have a lot more experience in looking at birds and recognizing extremely subtle variation, and then I can come back to Empids and feel like it's an exciting challenge instead of a "wow no thank you."

But other than the Empids I read through every page with fascination, even for birds that live in parts of North America that are nowhere near me, because it was still teaching me more about how to look at birds, even if that particular bird isn't relevant to me.

And I will definitely be regularly referring to this book in the future for help with some of these difficult-to-ID groups!
sophia_sol: photo of a 19th century ivory carving of a fat bird (Default)
Hey look, it only took me a year to get to the third book in this trilogy, after the five years it took between the first and the second; amazing, go me!

Unfortunately I think this is my least favourite book in the trilogy though. I think my feelings about the viewpoint character matter a lot in my enjoyment of these books! And Sieh is just not my character type at all. I was bored and impatient through much of the book, and I just didn't really ever get emotionally attached to him. Which is too bad, because there WAS interesting stuff happening! It's just...I would have preferred to see it from the point of view of almost any other character.

Sieh also seems to me like a choice that doesn't fit the pattern of the books. The other two are both narrated by mortal women who love a god, and this one is narrated by a god who loves some mortals. And the book's marketing description even makes you think it's going to fit the pattern of the other two books by focusing on the mortal woman Shahar, but she turns out to be just one of several important secondary characters. And instead I'm stuck with Sieh. (Sorry, Sieh!)

I am glad I read it, and I'm glad to know where the story went, but the second book is still unquestionably my favourite, and I think I'm unlikely to ever feel called to reread this one.
sophia_sol: photo of a 19th century ivory carving of a fat bird (Default)
One of Rose Lerner's early books, and I don't like it as well as her later works (I AM NEVER GOING TO BE OVER HOW PERFECT TRUE PRETENSES IS) but I didn't have anything strongly against it.

Part of my complaint is that there's just really a lot of plot. More than I care about. I was going to briefly sum up the premise here but like.... Too much going on, really. A lot of stuff about spies though, which is not really my thing. I liked the leads and believed in their interest in each other, and my interest was maintained through the book sufficiently that I finished it, but.....just not really nearly so much my thing as I usually expect from Lerner.

My biggest complaint is spoilers )
sophia_sol: photo of a 19th century ivory carving of a fat bird (Default)
This is a YA scifi novel loosely based on the fairy tale Sleeping Beauty. And...it's a lot more interesting than I expected going in!

Rose, the main character, is 16. But she's spent her whole life regularly being temporarily put in stasis, so it's been a lot more years than 16 since she was born. When she wakes from stasis at the beginning of the book, she thinks it's a time like all the others, but soon learns she's inexplicably been in stasis for many decades. Her family is all dead and the world is changed. Now she has to mourn the life she left behind and learn to make her way in this new world.

I have a few minor quibbles about the book but overall: I'm really impressed. I found Rose and her complicated relationships with the various other characters in the book really compelling.

this cut contains both spoilers and discussion of child abuse )
sophia_sol: photo of a 19th century ivory carving of a fat bird (Default)
Back in the days after I'd started keeping a list of all the books I read each year but BEFORE I started posting reviews of them, I kept desultory personal notes (ranging from a single word to quite a few paragraphs) on some of the books. And I always vaguely forget I have, and forget where exactly to find them, and I'd like to just have them on my dw so they're FINDABLE again for me. And also some of you might find these interesting/amusing? (N.B. some of these contain what I would now classify as INCORRECT OPINIONS.)

SO HERE'S THREE YEARS' WORTH OF BOOKS IN ONE POST, OKAY GO.

expand this cut to see nested cuts listing all the books )
sophia_sol: photo of a 19th century ivory carving of a fat bird (Default)
I picked this up because it was recced by [personal profile] skygiants as her favourite Snow Queen retelling, which obviously was going to be of interest to me as a thorough and longstanding Snow Queen fan.

Read more... )

And if anyone has recommendations of other novels based on The Snow Queen please do let me know so I can read them too! So far this one and the one by T. Kingfisher are the only ones I've come across.
sophia_sol: photo of a 19th century ivory carving of a fat bird (Default)
So one of the reccing communities I follow recently had two novel-length fics recced for the Rivers of London fandom and they looked kind of interesting so I gave one a try and loved it, read the other and loved it too, and proceeded to spend the next week or so reading nothing but Rivers of London fanfic. And eventually I was like....okay so maybe I should actually read the actual books these are based on, I've heard good things about those.

So I am! This is the first one in the series, and is known as Rivers of London in most of the world and Midnight Riot in North America because apparently we can't handle books with titles that indicate the book is foreign.

I was a little nervous going in that maybe I wouldn't like the books because fandom....does not always do a good job of representing what a canon is actually about or actually like. And I mean it's not quite what I expected, but still good. More focus on cases and less on people, but also much more of a sense of humour than I was expecting! I was 100% charmed by just a few pages into the book. And then I accidentally stayed up past my bedtime to finish the book. So, you know: I liked it.

For those who are unfamiliar, the basic premise is: policemen in London who do magic and deal with magic-related crimes. The main character, Peter, discovers the existence of magic early in the book and ends up apprenticed to Nightingale, more or less the last practitioner of Newtonian magic in Britain.

Some miscellaneous thoughts:

Read more... )
sophia_sol: photo of a 19th century ivory carving of a fat bird (Default)
I think my main take-away is that spending 2.5 months slowly reading through a book about the history of money makes money start to feel really really fake. I mean I already knew it's a human construct that we all collectively agree to give meaning to, and which would otherwise have no objective worth, but the whole thing is just feeling a little more ridiculous now.

Anyway: this is a good book! And very interesting! Does a good job of challenging some assumptions that the field of economy is based on, which tend to ignore the complicatedness of human relationships in favour of equations based on rational self-interest. Also the myth of barter.

It was fascinating to read the anthropology/history about the ways various groups of humans throughout time and space have approached concepts of debt, trade, cash money or lack thereof, etc. A good reminder that our current understanding of these things is by no means obvious, universal, or the best way to do things.

I wasn't expecting this book to come out nearly so strongly in critique of modern capitalism at the end as it did. I remember this being a popular book when it came out, and North America as a whole is pretty pro-capitalism! So that was a bit of a surprise. Though maybe it shouldn't have been given that the 2008 financial crisis formed the impetus for the author to write this book.
sophia_sol: photo of a 19th century ivory carving of a fat bird (Default)
Next up in my Great Courtney Milan Readthrough of November (....yes I am very behind in posting) is the Turner Series! Which I found pretttty uneven in my enjoyment of. I strongly disliked a major aspect of one of the three books, and adored the other two books.

Not even mentioned here: the side novella Unlocked, which I disliked enough that I didn't bother finishing.

Unveiled, by Courtney Milan )

Unraveled, by Courtney Milan )

Unclaimed, by Courtney Milan )
sophia_sol: photo of a 19th century ivory carving of a fat bird (Default)
First: shoutout to [personal profile] china_shop for recommending Courtney Milan's historicals to me last year and giving me spoilers for Duchess War and Heiress Effect - it was helpful to have a sense of what to expect from these books before I'd read enough to get a handle on Courtney Milan's trustworthiness as an author!

So this is the first half or so of the Brothers Sinister series, read slightly out of order because my hold on the Heiress Effect took too long to come in. (The Heiress Effect will be in my next post about the Brothers Sinister, which will be after the Turner trilogy and also some more Tamora Pierce.)


The Duchess War )

A Kiss for Midwinter )

The Governess Affair )

The Countess Conspiracy )
sophia_sol: photo of a 19th century ivory carving of a fat bird (Default)
Eh, it was a perfectly reasonable kids' book that I found totally uninspiring. There wasn't anything glaringly wrong with it, but I didn't get emotionally invested in the characters or the plot or anything.

I did like that in the context of this story's worldbuilding dragons' genders have no visual cues and dragons don't say anything about their genders, so dragons get referred to by nonbinary pronouns and titles. On the other hand the pronoun used for dragons is IT. And no, that wasn't me all-capsing for emphasis, that's actually how the book writes IT throughout. The dragon Meenore is one of the major characters in the book, which means that the pronoun IT gets shouted at you by the text a lot over the course of the book. So that's both a plus one and a minus one for nonbinary representation, I guess. Sigh.

Other than that...I am just super lacking in anything at all to say about anything in this book because I just didn't care.
sophia_sol: photo of a 19th century ivory carving of a fat bird (Default)
I was really excited to start this book! But from the very beginning I was disappointed, and it never managed to live up to what I hoped from it.

I mean, it starts by saying that it hopes to act as an introduction for both what queer is and what theology is, and I'm not exactly in need of 101 level discussion of either of those things. So it's possible that this book would have more to offer to someone who is a beginner on these subjects, since a lot of the book is a) defining terms, and b) acting as a lit review of previous relevant works on the subject of queer theology.

BUT even so I disagree with some of his beginner elements?? Read more... )
sophia_sol: photo of a 19th century ivory carving of a fat bird (Default)
A reread! Because I couldn't not after watching the movie. (Can you tell how far behind I am in posting my book thoughts?) I still love the unrepentant nerdiness at the level of science detail going on in this book. And the amount of things that can/do go wrong! It made me realize JUST HOW MUCH the movie had abbreviated Watney's problems.

But I was also reminded of just how little depth there really is to any of the characterization. And the writing quality stood out to me more this time as being... mm, not exactly the work of an experienced writer. It gets away with this in Watney's logs, but the narrative parts back on Earth (and the Hermes and so forth) are a bit more unfelicitous.

But oh well I LOVE IT ANYWAY it's charming and suuuuuper nerdy and that's enough to make me happy apparently.
sophia_sol: photo of a 19th century ivory carving of a fat bird (Default)
GOSH I LOVE FRANCES HARDINGE. This is a sequel to Fly By Night, which I read earlier this year and which was my introduction to Frances Hardinge. And after finishing Fly By Night I determined that I clearly needed to read everything Hardinge writes because it was SO GOOD. And this book, a sequel to Fly By Night, does not disappoint!

I'm...not exactly sure what to say about this book? I'm not sure if there's much of anything I can say without spoilers for Fly By Night, for starters. But I can and will say this: Mosca remains one of the BEST leading characters I've ever had the pleasure to read about in YA fiction. She's just so Mosca AND I LOVE HER.

Anyways it is clearly imperative that I continue to seek out the other books Frances Hardinge has written.
sophia_sol: photo of a 19th century ivory carving of a fat bird (Default)
I found a Valente book I'm capable of enjoying!

I read her Orphan's Tales duology a number of years ago because it sounded SO MUCH up my alley, but I just found it overwrought and uninteresting. And since then I kept on hearing about her new books and going "OOOOH" because the ideas and themes and whatever are things I enjoy! (for example: SHE WROTE A BOOK ABOUT PRESTER JOHN.) But having the Orphan's Tales as an example of her writing was a warning to me.

Eventually I decided to give her a second chance and began the first of her Fairyland books because I heard it was more accessible than her other stuff, but I just....nope. And I decided it was time to give up and acknowledge that Valente was not for me.

And then Deathless came out and it sounded EVEN MORE up my alley than any of her previous works (A RETELLING OF KOSCHEI THE DEATHLESS!!!!) and I was like, do I dare give it a try? And I waffled for years and finally I just couldn't resist. (and to tell the truth, the degree to which I love the cover of the book was an important factor in my decision)

AND IT TURNS OUT I LOVE IT.

I mean, it still has some of her usual issues. Occasionally it is weird in ways that don't actually add anything to the book, occasionally she's too opaque (WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY THE LAST PAGE OF THIS BOOK, I'M NOT CONVINCED I'M UNDERSTANDING YOU CORRECTLY), and quite often she tips over into overly-purple prose that just makes me roll my eyes and skim.

But overall it is atmospheric in a mostly good way, feels marvelously and gloriously like a fairy tale, and blends the fairy tale impressively well into real life Russian history. And I find Marya Morevna very interesting, and love her complicated relationship with Koschei.

It's the novelized retelling that the story of Koschei the Deathless deserves, and I'm very happy I read it.
sophia_sol: photo of a 19th century ivory carving of a fat bird (Default)
What a great secondary-world fantasy that doesn't involve any human characters at all. Also, this is now two books in a row I've read involving shapeshifters, but I am five million percent more into this book's shapeshifters because they are FLYING LIZARDY HUMANOIDS instead of werewolves. Wings win every time, sorry werewolves.

Read more... )
sophia_sol: photo of a 19th century ivory carving of a fat bird (Default)
GODDAMN I AM SO INTO THIS BOOK, I am just heart-eyes in all directions, I don't even know where to begin.

It's pretty much a crossover between The Twelve Dancing Princesses and the story of Persephone and Hades. spoilers from here on! )
sophia_sol: photo of a 19th century ivory carving of a fat bird (Default)
The Revolution Starts at Home: Confronting Partner Abuse in Activist Communities, edited by Ching-In Chen, Jai Dulani, and Leah Lakshmi Piepzna-Samarasinha

This is a zine (which you can read free online!) and does exactly what it says on the tin. It's a great read, with lots of really thoughtful and personal pieces by people with experience in the subject matter. And frankly I'm just gonna not step on their toes and say that if the title sounds like something you'd would find interesting or useful, I encourage you to read it.

Profile

sophia_sol: photo of a 19th century ivory carving of a fat bird (Default)
soph

June 2025

S M T W T F S
123 4567
891011 1213 14
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Most Popular Tags

Page generated Jul. 3rd, 2025 03:56 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios