sophia_sol: drawing of Combeferre, smiling and holding up a finger like he's about to explain something (Default)
An impromptu reread decision, and I'm reminded that although this is an enjoyable book it's not one my favourites of Pratchett's. I think I only ever read it the once as a kid, and didn't reread it a million times like I did some others in the series. cut for brief spoilers ) Death is great though. I do love Death.
sophia_sol: drawing of Combeferre, smiling and holding up a finger like he's about to explain something (Default)
A good book, since Terry Pratchett is a good writer*, but this was not one of the books that ever spoke to me most out of his oeuvre. Probably has something to do with the fact that I didn't actually grow up with Santa Claus as a thing, so this doesn't tap into my own childhood at all.

I do love Susan a lot though, and the wizardly academia jokes are so much more comprehensible to me as an adult, and I appreciate how Pratchett understands that children can be strange and alarming and bloodthirsty.

And of course there's the oft-quoted bit from near the end of the book where Death and Susan are talking about believing in things that aren't real, that believing in the Hogfather is practice for believing in justice and mercy and things like that. That's a really good bit.

*reading him as an adult is full of me going "HOW DOES HE DO THAT??". As a kid I just found him compulsively readable and funny.
sophia_sol: drawing of Combeferre, smiling and holding up a finger like he's about to explain something (Default)
Terry Pratchett is just such a good writer, gosh. Okay so like, obviously this was a reread. But I haven't reread this one for a lot of years at this point! And it's really great.

One thing I noticed while reading it is something that I'd never consciously recognized before about Pratchett's writing. Which is his style of setting up a series of facts and leaving the reader to connect them and draw the obvious conclusion of whatever you're supposed to gather from the scene. It's really effective!

cut for a mild spoiler )

I love the way this kind of thing makes the book feel like a collaboration with the reader.
sophia_sol: drawing of Combeferre, smiling and holding up a finger like he's about to explain something (Default)
Thanks, everyone, for the kind words in response to my last post. Much appreciated.

Now let's get back to my excessive backlog of book thoughts to post! I've got like TEN book posts written up... Let's start with this one.

Monstrous Regiment, by Terry Pratchett

yeah okay I guess all of this counts as spoilers )
sophia_sol: drawing of Combeferre, smiling and holding up a finger like he's about to explain something (Default)
List ten books that have stayed with you in some way. Don’t think too hard — they don’t have to be the “great” works, just the ones that have touched you.

Les Miserables, by Victor Hugo

Okay like did you take a look at my blog at all last year? Aaaand this year too though to a lesser extent? OH DUDE LES MIS. Like: a) pardon me while I cry about everything in this book, b) omg the in-your-face commitment to social justice, c) the optimism that WE CAN DO THIS, we can make the world better, humanity can be good, and d) AUGH I LOVE EVERYTHING ABOUT THIS BOOK. And it's one of those books that as you delve deeper there's always more to notice (and have feels over). Where has it been all my life? Why did I never think to try reading it earlier?

Terry Pratchett's entire oeuvre

I can't specify any one Terry Pratchett book. I grew up on Terry Pratchett. Terry Pratchett's books are in my soul. Cut me apart and I will bleed Terry Pratchett. TERRY PRATCHETT YOU GUYS. His books (and I read ALLLLLL of them; yes, even Dark Side Of The Sun and Strata, unfortunately) were just so deeply formative for me.

Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell, by Susanna Clarke

The first time I read this book I accidentally read the entire thing, all ~1,000 pages, in two days flat. I have tried in the past to explain why this book means so much to me and why I am so flipping gone on it and I can never quite get there. But. THIS BOOK. THIS BOOK. I JUST.

Trapped, by James Alan Gardner

Okay so picture me and Essie at like 14 years old or something like that. I was staying over at Essie's place for a sleepover and Essie's parents had a hot tub. While we were sitting in the hot tub that evening, Essie began telling me about this really amazing book she'd read recently. I was fascinated, so she recounted for me the entire plot of the book from beginning to end over the course of the whole evening. It was awesome.

I later read the book myself (later that year, maybe?), and it was super great - and it remains super great, though there are other James Alan Gardner books I would say are even better. But I have an inexpressible additional fondness remaining for this book because of Essie's impassioned teenage explanation for why and how this book was just so brilliant.

Swallows & Amazons, by Arthur Ransome

Children going camping by themselves on an island using a sailboat and having adventures! Hell yeah! Swallows and Amazons forever!

Where There Is No Doctor: A Village Health Care Handbook for Africa, by David Werner

This book was directly relevant to my family's life when I was a wee kidlet - doing what it says in the title, giving information on how to deal with health challenges when you're in a situation with no doctor or a poor health care system, speaking specifically to an African context.

But the way it has really affected me was the fact that it continued to sit on my parents' bookshelves after we moved back to North America. And here's the thing about being the parent of a book-loving child: she WILL go through your bookshelves and find everything of interest on it.

And this book is illustrated throughout with very matter-of-fact illustrations about a wide range of dire (and not so dire) health problems and treatments, and it was EXTREMELY COMPELLING. I spent a lot of time as a kid sitting on the floor by the bookshelves just paging through this, reading or skimming or looking at the illustrations as I felt moved.

When I flip through it today, everything about it looks so, so familiar.

And it was educational too! I remember clearly that it was from this book that I first learned about the placebo effect, for example. And I'm quite sure that lots of the other information seeped in as well, even if I don't remember various bits of information or ways of looking at the world as coming from this book specifically.

Anyways: god I love this book. It is REALLY GREAT.

Pastwatch: The Redemption of Christopher Columbus, by Orson Scott Card

Oh dear I am kind of embarrassed about this because Orson Scott Card. But this was my ABSOLUTE FAVOURITE book back in my high school days. I reread it approximately a million times and it never got old. I loved Pastwatch, this organization that was all about studying history, the reality of history instead of what history books said. I loved Tagiri, watching her family history backwards, back and back and back through the Pastwatch machines to see the causes of everything. I kind of identified with her, actually, and dearly wished that more people knew this book to so that I could use Tagiri as a reference for explaining why it was NOT cheating for me to read the last chapter of a book first so I would know how it ended going in.

I loved that all these deeply caring people came together to change the past and make it better, I loved that Columbus was a good man underneath the influences of his culture and society, I loved that the main characters were a whole mix of races and that there were plenty of women as well as men, I loved that it was ultimately such a hopeful book. I loved all of the characters. I loved how the book thought about history. I loved EVERYTHING, OKAY?

But I haven't reread this book in maaaany years at this point and I kind of don't ever want to reread it again. Because these days I know Orson Scott Card holds a lot of opinions about a lot of things that I REALLY don't agree with and I'm pretty sure a bunch of that stuff pervades this book as I'm told it does with his other books. (eg: racism, gender essentialism, homophobia, and probably more.) I've always been rather too good at being oblivious and I'm quite sure my younger self wouldn't have noticed any of that sort of crap. And I don't trust that I could reread this book without getting angry at it and at Card and ruining it. So I would much rather just let my teenage self enjoy the book in my memory and not discover the ways in which it is actually terrible.

I really really love the book in my memory.

The Homeward Bounders, by Diana Wynne Jones

Gosh this is a powerful book. And pretty dark, for a younger-end-of-YA novel. I don't remember how old I was when I first read it, but it really stuck with me - especially the end, the life that Jamie has given himself to.

The Enchanted Forest Chronicles, by Patricia C Wrede

Awww, charming and (mostly) feminist approach to fairy-tale-land! Everything I ever loved when I was younger! Rereading these days I definitely notice the flaws, but there's still a lot the series does right. And I just love Cimorene and Kazul and Morwen. And the whole world of the Enchanted Forest and so forth!

The Blue Castle, by LM Montgomery

The ultimate comfort read for me. It's a story about deserving nice things no matter how much people tell you that you don't matter, and a story where those nice things are BOOKS and NATURE and GOOD PEOPLE WHO LOVE YOU. *happy sigh* I generally end up rereading this at least every year and sometimes more often.
sophia_sol: drawing of Combeferre, smiling and holding up a finger like he's about to explain something (Default)
For inexplicable reasons (no really I have no clue why) this was the Pratchett book I reread the most often as a teenager. As such, rereading it was a deeply familiar experience. So it's hard to be objective about a lot of it? Because it has been a part of me for so long!

One major difference this reread is that I have since read a whole bunch of meticulously researched Age of Sail novels (thank you Patrick O'Brian) and thus have an entirely new sense of UTTER HORROR at Vimes's behaviour on that boat. AUGH VIMES NO.

Also I've never been fond of Colon-and-Nobby storylines and that's only gotten worse as I've gotten older. I ended up skimming or skipping over those scenes this time.

But overall the reading experience was just nice nostalgia. (and also a creeping realization of how utterly bone-deep familiar Pratchett's narrative voice is for me. I read SO MUCH PRATCHETT as a teenager! I guess it was kind of inevitable!)
sophia_sol: drawing of Combeferre, smiling and holding up a finger like he's about to explain something (Default)
okay so. I reread Terry Pratchett's Night Watch this week! The last time I read it was MANY YEARS ago, and the last time I read it I was still inexplicably unaware of the connection between it and Les Miserables. Looking at the date Night Watch was published, I'm pretty sure I read it for the first time before I got into Les Miserables, and I'm guessing that since my initial impression of the book involved zero knowledge of Les Miserables, once it was cemented in my head it never occurred to me on rereads to connect it with Les Miserables. DESPITE noticing the line about stealing a loaf of bread on rereads!

Probably my lack of connection was also because in high school the revolution part of Les Miserables was the part I was least interested in, and that's where the connection from Night Watch is strongest.

ANYWAYS. It was deeply weird rereading it now, both because of me having grown up some and because of me being newly acquainted with a) the revolutionary portions of Les Miserables and b) the fact that Night Watch can be read in the context of Les Miserables.

My conclusions: cut for spoilers )

Most Popular Tags

Page generated Oct. 21st, 2017 01:02 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios