sophia_sol: photo of a 19th century ivory carving of a fat bird (Default)
Fairy-tale retelling novella starring two older queer women! When I started this book I thought it was merely an interesting mashup of fairy tales, but by the time I got to the end I had MANY feelings. It's really good!

Burning Roses stars Rosa, from the story Little Red Riding Hood, and Hou Yi, from the Chinese mythology about...Hou Yi. And various other fairy tales are relevant to them as well. (if you're familiar with the stories about Hou Yi, you'll know that traditionally Hou Yi's a man. In this story she's a trans woman.)

The story in this book takes place at a time in their lives when both Rosa and Hou Yi are much older than your standard fantasy protagonist. And both women are being forced to confront the (fairly massive) mistakes they've both made in their pasts. I loved the complexities with which this was addressed. Both women are sympathetic, even as they're also deeply flawed, and neither part is pushed aside for the other.

I also loved the varying types of relationships shown to be important in this book: family, found family, friendship, both biological and non-biological children. And wlw can both love women romantically and have deep and important non-romantic relationships with other women.

There's a short story set in the same world as this book, which I read years ago and loved, and my dawning realization of the connection between the two narratives was so cool. The short story is from the perspective of Rosa's daughter, and is free online: Hunting Monsters.

Thanks so much to [twitter.com profile] bardic_lady for bringing Burning Roses to my attention!
sophia_sol: photo of a 19th century ivory carving of a fat bird (Default)
I've started working on reading through the things on the Hugo nominations list, in preparation for voting this summer! I'm hampered right now in many categories by not all nominees being available either for free online or from my library as an e-resource, but I'm hoping that when the Hugo Voters Packet comes that'll help.

But I can do the short stories no problem.

I'd already read all but one of the short stories on the nominee list, because for the last number of years I have make it a regular practice to give a try to everything published by the major SFF magazines that provide their stories for free online. The one I hadn't read is is published by a horror magazine, and horror is really not my thing so I don't frequent horror venues.

I bookmark on my pinboard all the stories that I like well enough to want to be able to find again in the future. And none of this year's nominees are on my pinboard. Which means that none of them spoke to me when I first read them, which is disappointing when I think of how many stories I read in the last year which I loved and which are not a Hugo nominee. At least the nominees are all stories I found compelling enough that I actually read them all to the end when I first encountered them!

I've now given a reread to all the short stories I'd read before, and a first read to the one I hadn't. And looking at the stories together, I think that Hugo nominators as a group must be more interested in bleak or angry or violent stories than I am. Ah well.

Here's my (occasionally spoilery) thoughts about all the nominated stories, organized from my first choice vote to my last. None of these will go below No Award, because I do see admirable things in all of them, even if none are really to my taste.

Read more... )

I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts if you've read any of these stories! (Except the cannibalism one. Please do not talk to me about cannibalism. Thank you.)

Most Popular Tags

Page generated Jun. 28th, 2025 06:48 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios